What Do You Call THAT? Increased Demand for Hybrid Skills

Article originally published on June 2015 and republished with permission from InterpretAmerica. Visit their blog to learn more about their work.

What do you call an animal with the body of an equine, a horn and a fish tail? It is an interesting hybrid but it is not a horse, it is not a unicorn and it is not a fish. The funny thing about names, nouns, is that they define a common point of reference, and by doing so, they facilitate communication on many different levels.

So, when I was called to work on another remote interpreting project, I was excited.

QuestionsI had already done a few – once in a studio (great experience), several conferences, a few times over the telephone (over the phone interpreting (OPI) can be very convenient). But my worst experience ever was using two telephone lines while juggling a presentation and a chat session with my interpreting partner, on my computer, for the hand-overs. We survived.

None of that prepared me for the last two “remote interpreting” requests. First of all, there was no interpreting as it is defined: facilitating communication between a speaker and an immediate audience. For this project, I would be recording my voice after the presentation was over, without breaks or a partner, and no visual prompts.

That sounded more like a voice-over project to me. The main differences were the expectation of having someone speak for a whole hour without stopping, the lack of visual prompts, and do it while listening in on one telephone and speaking into another for remote recording.

This practice has been taking place for a few years, it seems, without regard for the target-language audience, how it reflects on the speaker’s performance, or the voice talent’s well-being. I say voice-talent because you don’t really need an interpreter to do this job, except for the fact that they expect the professional to provide the target-language version simultaneously with listening, without a script.

A few decades ago, it became acceptable to provide the translation of audio files without the transcription. This is the next step: voice-overs without the script.

Here we run into interpreter-related issues that providers who offer these services may not be privy to: mental and physical stress. Interpreting without visual stimuli is more stressful, speaking for stretches longer than 45 minutes compromises accuracy, which creates more stress, vocal chords need to relax, the interpreter needs to unwind… And then comes the two telephones bit, and the quality of the recording itself – both in content and sound. There is new technology available that can make this new business practice more efficient and still financially viable.

Is there room for dialogue? Remote simultaneous voice-over seems to be in its infancy and professional interpreters have to work together with those who offer that service to educate them on the other aspects of an interpreter’s work. There is much to be shared from both sides and gained by all, including clients.

© Giovanna Lester 2015

4 Comments
  • AJ Elterman
    Posted at 11:47h, 15 January Reply

    Thank you for sharing this extraordinary experience. I would only disagree with this part of your comments:
    “I say voice-talent because you don’t really need an interpreter to do this job, except for the fact that they expect the professional to provide the target-language version simultaneously with listening, without a script.”

    In my view, not only does this work require a simultaneous interpreter, but one of the highest caliber, doing what U.N. and other simultaneous conference interpreters do without a script!

    I wonder if anyone can produce a studio quality “voiced-over” interpretation of a long speech like that both accurately and smoothly, at a broadcast level.

    • Gio Lester
      Posted at 18:00h, 15 January Reply

      Sorry that the sarcasm did not go over as intended, AJ. My children tell me I should give up on that…

      At any rate, UN interpreters do not do what they were requesting of me, either. There is an urgency during a live interpreting assignment that is a palpable part of the job.

      They were looking for a voice-over professional with simultaneous interpreting skills. I do both jobs. Doing them at the same time is as easy as sight translation without prior reading of the material. We stumble. We rush. We edit as we deliver. It is frustrating!

      I do not have the required training to do that and deliver an accurate and smooth product, as you describe.

  • Georganne Weller
    Posted at 12:27h, 15 January Reply

    Gio:
    As always, thanks for your contributions to the field! I missed the previous versión so am very glad that NAJIT has renewed interest in all of us through the blog. ABRACOS.

    • Gio Lester
      Posted at 18:01h, 15 January Reply

      Hi Georganne! Glad you got to see it. Abrazos!

Post A Comment